<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Corporate Blogging, Problems With</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.monkeyatlarge.com/archives/2005/11/04/corporate-blogging-problems-with/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.monkeyatlarge.com/archives/2005/11/04/corporate-blogging-problems-with/</link>
	<description>Random musings on life, technology and other miscellany.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:08:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Lyons</title>
		<link>http://www.monkeyatlarge.com/archives/2005/11/04/corporate-blogging-problems-with/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Lyons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 15:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monkeyatlarge.com/?p=31#comment-26</guid>
		<description>This is classic.  You point out the obvious and you get scolded while all the STSMs and DEs that fucked up Workplace and ruined a promissing new product get a pat on the back, stock options and get a free ticket to a new project  Accountability and honesty are alien concepts inside IBM.  You&#039;re lucky to be out of the place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is classic.  You point out the obvious and you get scolded while all the STSMs and DEs that fucked up Workplace and ruined a promissing new product get a pat on the back, stock options and get a free ticket to a new project  Accountability and honesty are alien concepts inside IBM.  You&#8217;re lucky to be out of the place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: some worker at some company</title>
		<link>http://www.monkeyatlarge.com/archives/2005/11/04/corporate-blogging-problems-with/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>some worker at some company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 01:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monkeyatlarge.com/?p=31#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Considering that most of the people in this world choose to hide faults rather than to fix them, I would have to say that option B is more likely to happen. People hate having the obvious pointed out to them. If they knew something was a problem, they would rather it slowly get dissolved into the background than to have the problem aired out in the open by people who make way less money than them. It&#039;s lame, but that&#039;s how I see things work in the corporate world.

I&#039;ve been scolded for what I would say is being realistic (but I guess in a James-esque no holds barred kind of way), and it&#039;s funny to know that the most recent incident wasn&#039;t even because my direct management felt strongly about it, it was like &quot;so-and-so was upset about your post&quot;, and I got the whole, &quot;these are the people who are going to help you in your career in the future&quot; kind of argument, which to me is meaningless if a person gets all crybaby about it and has to escalate up my management chain instead of being normal and talking to me about it directly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering that most of the people in this world choose to hide faults rather than to fix them, I would have to say that option B is more likely to happen. People hate having the obvious pointed out to them. If they knew something was a problem, they would rather it slowly get dissolved into the background than to have the problem aired out in the open by people who make way less money than them. It&#8217;s lame, but that&#8217;s how I see things work in the corporate world.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been scolded for what I would say is being realistic (but I guess in a James-esque no holds barred kind of way), and it&#8217;s funny to know that the most recent incident wasn&#8217;t even because my direct management felt strongly about it, it was like &#8220;so-and-so was upset about your post&#8221;, and I got the whole, &#8220;these are the people who are going to help you in your career in the future&#8221; kind of argument, which to me is meaningless if a person gets all crybaby about it and has to escalate up my management chain instead of being normal and talking to me about it directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martymoo</title>
		<link>http://www.monkeyatlarge.com/archives/2005/11/04/corporate-blogging-problems-with/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>martymoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2005 22:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.monkeyatlarge.com/?p=31#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Seen this? It&#039;s on IBM&#039;s intranet frontpage, interestingly enough. 

http://news.ft.com/cms/s/5bf3007c-4c98-11da-89df-0000779e2340.html

Hopefully &quot;a&quot; will happen, although I think that small-minded micro-managers will always try to control what their direct-reports say (heck, this is true even with some wide-audience e-mail&#039;s I&#039;ve sent in the past).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seen this? It&#8217;s on IBM&#8217;s intranet frontpage, interestingly enough. </p>
<p><a href="http://news.ft.com/cms/s/5bf3007c-4c98-11da-89df-0000779e2340.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.ft.com/cms/s/5bf3007c-4c98-11da-89df-0000779e2340.html</a></p>
<p>Hopefully &#8220;a&#8221; will happen, although I think that small-minded micro-managers will always try to control what their direct-reports say (heck, this is true even with some wide-audience e-mail&#8217;s I&#8217;ve sent in the past).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

